Commodore Remix

CraigG wrote:Although in my browser, the top bar is always broken into three pieces on separate lines.

Any better now?
What browser do you use? I only checked Mozilla & IE.

- Markus

Ah, see, I'm one of those awkward Mac users, and I mostly use Safari (as do an absolute shed-load of Mac users now). However, although I'm awkward, I can also be helpful, so here's what I see on those pages:



Safari is, on the whole, extremely standards-compliant, so I'm not sure what the problem might be.

Thanx LMan! :O)

That statistic view is really a nice thing. It gives you the nice abillity to see what the majority of the voters have voted. A single smiley showing a "very good" face, can be misleading, especially when the percentage is close to the "border" of another voting category (as with my two current remixes). nice feature! don't remove it! ;O)

Thanks razmo

Craig, how does it look now?

- Markus

Looks perfect to me now. Thanks for looking after us Mac users!

I agree - this is really good - and well put together. It also shows how little the 'poor' votes contribute to the overall rating (proving a point about poor votes having little effect)

Many thanks Lman - once again your hard work will (hopefully) pay dividend and maybe even end this discussion....maybe. Top work !

I agree too, superb work, Markus.
Many thanks for that!

Cheers,
Monty

thanks LMan for your great effort.. very usefull this little add-on....

...a little x-mas gift for us nasty remixers....




cheers ifadeo

Well, even if it doesn't end the discussion, it does somewhat prove what Neil and Marcus have been arguing all along: how inconsequential those "bad" votes are to the overall score. After all, every track seems to have a couple.

> Neil and Marcus have been arguing all along:
And me... I originally looked at the votes some time ago and officially posted the conclusion on this very forum that there was no anti-voting: and that it's the yellow smileys that drag marks down.

Chris

Well, even if it doesn't end the discussion, it does somewhat prove what Neil and Marcus (and Chris, who I totally forgot about, despite him now being the editor of this site, and despite having composed a two-thousand word interview with him for Pixelsurgeon) have been arguing all along: how inconsequential those "bad" votes are to the overall score. After all, every track seems to have a couple.

carlsson wrote:

DHS wrote:Can i refuse to upload my next works (if there will be any) to RKO, or must i comply with the mass?

Is there some deal for exclusive rights to publish remixes through the "official" channels if one has your own channels of distribution?

Nopes, not on my site, never. On the contrary.

RKO was never intended as an "official' channel for anything. That's all in people's heads.

"One-stop site" is prolly a better phrase for what I intended.

Or even "World Domination". No wait, that's Chris Abbott territory.

> No wait, that's Chris Abbott territory.
You better believe it baby * chomps cigar *

<devil's advocate>
Actually Jan, you do call RKO "definitive" on the front page. Maybe you ought to rephrase?
</devil's advocate>

actually chris is new page reads....."The page cannot be displayed"

I kinda like it, it's got a ring to it

> I kinda like it, it's got a ring to it
Yeah, but that's all style and no substance...

Chris