Page 1 of 1

To avoid disastrous results

Posted: 09/06/2005 - 16:34
by Zuckerfrei
"Phew! A lot of work was done. After several weeks of frequent arranging
and editing it was finally finished. Yep! I think that one will be fairly good!!!"

Those were the thougts I had when I decided to upload: The Last V8. 8)

Unfortunately the overall rating was ... lets say ... disappointing!!! :shock:

To avoid those disastrous events in the future, I want to ask some of you
out there to create something like a quality network. This could enhance
the overall quality of the remixes and at the same time would diminish the
number of disappointing moments.

Members of this network could beta listen ready remixes just in order to
gain something like an assessment.

So, what do you think about that?

Posted: 09/06/2005 - 17:01
by Vosla
Dunno what you exactly envision with "quality network" but it helped a lot for some members here to post links to unfinished remixes to get some feedback while the bread is still in the oven. :)

...

Posted: 10/06/2005 - 9:08
by 1337
How can a computer sort out the bits of a piece of music that don't sound so good? I know that probably sounds like the dumbest question in the history of this forum... but I always thought that it was the composer/remixer that puts the notes in and then the computer plays them. Have I totally missed the point here?

1337

Posted: 10/06/2005 - 14:10
by Vosla
1337 wrote:Have I totally missed the point here?
Uhm...Yes?
With "quality network" Zuckerfrei doesn't addressed a computer program to be written but a net based gathering of human members.
Zuckerfrei wrote:Members of this network could beta listen ready remixes just in order to gain something like an assessment.
This is the core statement. :)

Posted: 11/06/2005 - 1:23
by Zuckerfrei
Vosla is right. That was exactly the intention.

However, if it is common practice to submit links to betaversions
within this forum, I will do so the next time. :wink:

Thanx anyway.

...

Posted: 11/06/2005 - 10:10
by 1337
:oops: *headdesk* :oops:

Damn, must've been tired when reading.

1337