video for instant remedys outrun remix!

Martin (IR) · Post by **Martin (IR)** » 29/03/2004 - 6:25

Wow! Way cool!
Real good way of putting together excellent footage.
Could most certainly be something you see at MTV, the feel is just right

Great stuff infamous!
Brings new life to this tune, I haven't listened to it for years. Thanks!

arvirus · Post by **arvirus** » 29/03/2004 - 6:38

Chris Abbott wrote:> the video features scenes from "the fast and the furious" and
> tasty gogo-girls
Nah, Arvid followed the time honored tradition of making it look expensive by borrowing footage from "The Fast and the Furious" and some video featuring Gogo girls: true transformative reuse in action!

you mean "borrowing" and not giving it back

That's the beauty of underground non-commercial art, I guess

yeah, and it saves a lot of money

btw, if anybody cares: the dancing girls are from the video "ballet dancer" by "master blaster". the song is a remix of the 80s hit by "the twins".

Martin (IR) wrote:Wow! Way cool!
Real good way of putting together excellent footage.
Could most certainly be something you see at MTV, the feel is just right
Great stuff infamous!
Brings new life to this tune, I haven't listened to it for years. Thanks!

thanx, martin but the video is done by MEEEEEEEE (arvid) not infamous

Martin (IR) · Post by **Martin (IR)** » 29/03/2004 - 9:03

Oh damn it!
Why did I call you Infamous? I don't know what happened here... I'm really sorry Arvid

Embarrassing mistake, now everyone think I'm ignorant towards my fans... which I'm not. I feel very honoured that anyone does something like this to my music! (who wouldn't be?)
Thanks for putting time into this Arvid. People here at work were impressed as well

Sorry once again.

arvirus · Post by **arvirus** » 29/03/2004 - 9:07

Martin (IR) wrote:Oh damn it!
Why did I call you Infamous? I don't know what happened here... I'm really sorry Arvid
Embarrassing mistake, now everyone think I'm ignorant towards my fans... which I'm not. I feel very honoured that anyone does something like this to my music! (who wouldn't be?)
Thanks for putting time into this Arvid. People here at work were impressed as well
Sorry once again.

no problem!

SelectaNovel · Post by **SelectaNovel** » 29/03/2004 - 11:11

Hehe, that's really a funny idea. Gotta admit though, that I don't like the way it is realised here. This may be due to the fact I'm not getting any feeling for that remix...it's kind of thin on the video and doesn't suit the babes and cars. Plus: The clip and the remix are both very fast paced, but there are far too few cuts...at least they are not at the positions where they could make the visualisation more pushing.

arvirus · Post by **arvirus** » 29/03/2004 - 11:23

SelectaNovel wrote:Hehe, that's really a funny idea. Gotta admit though, that I don't like the way it is realised here. This may be due to the fact I'm not getting any feeling for that remix...it's kind of thin on the video and doesn't suit the babes and cars. Plus: The clip and the remix are both very fast paced, but there are far too few cuts...at least they are not at the positions where they could make the visualisation more pushing.

@SelectaNovel: i have a different opinion on EVERY point of your post. but as we all know opinions may differ

i'm looking forward to see your attempt!

Chris Abbott · Post by **Chris Abbott** » 29/03/2004 - 11:38

> Plus: The clip and the remix are both very fast paced, but there are
> far too few cuts...at least they are not at the positions where they
> could make the visualisation more pushing.

Isn't that a result of using Hollywood footage instead of hyperactive pop video footage? Less cuts and more coherence action. I know which one I'd rather watch. These MTV cutz verge on incoherent sometimes.

Chris

Infamous · Post by **Infamous** » 29/03/2004 - 13:10

huh?

i was famous for how long?

heh.. kenz!! kenz!! kenz!! kenzy wenzy! wonderfull.. bloody loved both them demo's on me old miggy especially 9fingers.. memories came flooding back

.

merman · Post by **merman** » 29/03/2004 - 14:33

Chris Abbott wrote:> Plus: The clip and the remix are both very fast paced, but there are
> far too few cuts...at least they are not at the positions where they
> could make the visualisation more pushing.

Isn't that a result of using Hollywood footage instead of hyperactive pop video footage? Less cuts and more coherence action. I know which one I'd rather watch. These MTV cutz verge on incoherent sometimes.

I think the director in charge of the French TV coverage of France v England (rugby union) at the weekend thought he was making a pop video - cuts about every 5 seconds, trying to use every single angle he had, even cutting to the unstable pole cameras on the pitch edge when they were pointing at the ground...

SelectaNovel · Post by **SelectaNovel** » 29/03/2004 - 15:31

arvirus wrote: @SelectaNovel: i have a different opinion on EVERY point of your post. but as we all know opinions may differ

No they may not. I'm right.

i'm looking forward to see your attempt!

Well, I got me a video editing card last year and I actually had the idea of doing something like this. But you won't like the result, I suppose.

arvirus · Post by **arvirus** » 30/03/2004 - 9:41

wow, over 200 downloads until now! but i have to remove the file because i have a traffic-limit.
it would be great if you could host the file, chris!

Jan Lund Thomsen · Post by **Jan Lund Thomsen** » 30/03/2004 - 9:52

arvirus wrote:wow, over 200 downloads until now! but i have to remove the file because i have a traffic-limit.
it would be great if you could host the file, chris!

Bittorrent, anyone ?

Chris Abbott · Post by **Chris Abbott** » 30/03/2004 - 10:34

I'll try and put it up in the next couple of days

*coughs*

*splutters*

* ill (again, will it ever stop?) *

Chris