as Neil said in the NEWS

Hehe.....hehehe.....eeehhhh......he said "Anal".hehehe....hehe....ehhhh......Chris Abbott wrote:(for instance, Mixer's "Anal-ogue" remix).
I think this is exactly right, even in the case of catchy dance numbers, as opposed to the filmic stuff on R64 2. I was somewhat surprised to see Rubicon on there - I didn't think Jereon liked his stuff being remixed by others...Chris Abbott wrote:The most you can hope for in that case is that you've done a good enough job to make the piece likeable in its own right
Well, i don't think that the tracks are not sooo well-known..arvirus wrote: i only know two of the original sids! the music you choose to remix is not so well-known. i connect memories to the tunes ... and isn't that the purpose of a remix-cd?
you said "the original sid files" and that is imho another problem. when i hear a remix i want to recognize the original tune. and when i think of "orchestral" remixes this is often not the case. for example "war" on back in time 3 has very less in common with the original sid-file. don't get me wrong, i love this remix, it's even my favourite track on this cd. i think it's very good music on it's own but not as a c64-remix. what i want to say is: if on bit3 there only would have been orchestral-remixes of tracks i hardly know, i probably wouldn't have bought it. (i hope these were the right tensestom wrote: Well, i don't think that the tracks are not sooo well-known..
Please give some of the original sid files (which are provided for download,too) a listen and mostly then the <b>"AHHHH.." Effect</b> appears![]()
i think remix 64 v1 had way more advertisement than galway remixed, but this could only be my impression.Tas wrote:now to say people don't go for diversity isn't exactly true. Galway remixed (Majority big hit tunes) and remix64 v1 (much like v2 in terms of diversity of tunes picked) sold near enough the same amount, give or take. So it isn't always the case.
okay, but how do you want to attract the people outside the c64-scene? or do you mean "broader minded" people inside the c64-scene?Tas wrote:but galway remixed is aimed deffinately at nostalgia, where v2 is aimed at something much more broader minded.
i think that differs from every person and, like chris said, even by country.Tas wrote:and i think theres 50/50 of big name tunes and not so buig names.
Rubicon, i think thats popular, Spellbound, Shades, Parallax, fist2, Times of lore, giana sisters, stormlord, Barbarian, all i would have thought huge hits!
hold on, scratching my head now... thats quite a big line up isn't it? or am i the only one who thinks so!!!!
Tas wrote:one thing i'm certainkly not doing is more sanxions,montys, ect etc. We've all heard that! and i'm not about to fix something thats not broken!
Tas wrote:arvirus, if you don't mind me asking, what sids that have not yet been covered by a CD would you consider bigs hits? i'm curious!
That's the example I usually use, although it has to be said, that track had the marketing clout of the MoS behind it - something that Remix64 2 won't have. Therefore getting it "out there" to non-C64 fans won't be easy.Tas wrote:lets look at Lazy Jones. Now before zombie nation got their hands on it, many people would be non the wiser about the sid.