C64 Collaboration .... Anyone interested??

Retrovertigo · Post by **Retrovertigo** » 16/06/2003 - 16:57

Hi

First post here and i'm already on the hunt. Basically I'm looking for anyone who might be interested in collaborating on a remix/rework of an old c64 tune. I've quite a bit of production work done myself on various different projects outside of the 64 but I'm really interested in teaming up with a few people because I think it would present a bit of a challenge.

Track is open to debate as would be any aspect. I'm an experienced guitar player but can comfortably cover most areas of a track. Any drum programming wizards or synth legends out there who are looking for a new angle?

Larsec · Post by **Larsec** » 17/06/2003 - 23:50

I would love to do something with you. Anything with guitars sounds good to me

Unfortunatly I am already engaged in several co-ops and own projects... another time when I clear my scheduel perhaps

I use Reason 2.5 BTW

XGener8or · Post by **XGener8or** » 18/06/2003 - 8:55

That sounds cool. I think I'd like to join in

But it's gonna be tough because we dont all have the same synths etc...

I used to do collas using Yamaha XG, and we just sent the midi files over.

Are you thinkin of just one particular SID? Or maybe a "MegaMix Sid-O-Rama Marathon"

Retrovertigo · Post by **Retrovertigo** » 18/06/2003 - 10:13

I've no particular track in mind as such. I think probably the best way to do it would be for someone to start a basic drum/click track and we all add parts from there. I use Reason 2 and Cool Edit Pro 2. If we agreed on a sequencer I suppose we could just mail each other the .wav and arrangement files. Or even if anyone has an already started track then we can just start from there..............

Retrovertigo · Post by **Retrovertigo** » 18/06/2003 - 10:38

Larsec, what do you have Reason 2.5 on??

Larsec · Post by **Larsec** » 18/06/2003 - 13:35

I have it on CDs, original CDs

Retrovertigo · Post by **Retrovertigo** » 18/06/2003 - 14:07

lol...no i meant PC or Mac. Does it live up to expectations?

Larsec · Post by **Larsec** » 18/06/2003 - 14:10

Retrovertigo wrote:lol...no i meant PC or Mac. Does it live up to expectations?

PC

I have heard people who are extremly disappointed and people who are crazy about it... I love it, I must say

The vocodoer, the Distortion module, the Unison... I LOVE IT!!!

Retrovertigo · Post by **Retrovertigo** » 18/06/2003 - 14:50

I want it!

Im dying to get my hands on it actually. I heard the EQ is way better than before. Im interested in the vocoder too. As far as im concerned Propellorhead cant put a foot wrong at the moment.

But this is beside the point...!

Larsec · Post by **Larsec** » 18/06/2003 - 14:57

Retrovertigo wrote:But this is beside the point...!

LOL... You on PC too?

Retrovertigo · Post by **Retrovertigo** » 18/06/2003 - 15:26

I am indeed. Im not mad about macs.

XGener8or · Post by **XGener8or** » 19/06/2003 - 9:23

Hm, I use Cakewalk Sonar 2.2

ifadeo · Post by **ifadeo** » 19/06/2003 - 9:31

XGener8or wrote:Hm, I use Cakewalk Sonar 2.2

me too..., i love this tool

cubase sx sucks....

logic on a mac is cool...

cheers 2Klang

putzi · Post by **putzi** » 20/06/2003 - 2:26

WhatÃ‚Â´s wrong with Cubase SX?

XGener8or · Post by **XGener8or** » 20/06/2003 - 7:22

I guess it's a matter of tastes. I for example have used Cakewalk products since Pro Audio 5. A few times I have tried to use Cubase but it's so different/confusing and I didn't have patience to start learning it