Should RKO start using BitTorrent for downloads?

Talk freely about the scene, the world of remixing, or anything off-topic unsuitable for the "Fun Forum".

Should RKO start using BitTorrent for downloads?

Only for complete mirrors
6
10%
For complete mirrors and as an alternative download method
39
64%
Use BitTorrent distribution exclusively
0
No votes
If RKO switches to exclusively to BitTorrent downloads I'll install a client, but I won't help share afterwards.
4
7%
I can't be bothered to install a BitTorrent client. Even if it's the only way to get the tunes.
12
20%
 
Total votes: 61

Chris Abbott
Forum God
Forum God
Posts: 5307
Joined: 22/11/2002 - 12:21
Location: Dubai. No, not really.
Contact:

Post by Chris Abbott »

ToxicGTE wrote:This might upset a few remixers, so sorry in advance. It seems ok to have a torrent file set up to download a collection of tracks like May_05, June_05, July_05 etc, but still keep the individual track download option. I don`t want to wait a few days to download the torrent then find that I don`t like 95% of the remixes and deleting most of them. Not because the remix was crap, but maybe I never liked the original tune in the first place or it`s not my cup of tea, sorry..
It would only upset remixers if you named them as part of the group you didn't like. Otherwise all the musicians will be sitting there saying to themselves: "I'm sure he loves ME" :)

Chris
User avatar
FFRenzy
Forum Celebrity
Forum Celebrity
Posts: 440
Joined: 01/05/2005 - 13:47

Post by FFRenzy »

AS an avid downloader i think using bittorrent for RKO would be great for "archived tracks" but not for more recent ones.

i'd suggest having the tracks of last year downloadable on a per-track basis, like now. Tracks older than those could go into packs, that are downloadable using BT. A pack per month (or quarter) would keep the number of packs managable, and wouldn't give people whe just 1 track too much overhead when downloading, IMHO.
User avatar
gibs
Forum Loony
Forum Loony
Posts: 249
Joined: 19/10/2005 - 8:42
Location: France
Contact:

Post by gibs »

CraigG wrote:I don't have the time or inclination to start faffing around with P2P stuff. I've downloaded a whole lot of stuff from RKO in my time, and have sent plenty of reviews to this very site; however, if RKO were to go solely down the BitTorrent route, I'd probably never download another track again. Of course, I have absolutely no problem with it being used as an alternate download method, but making it the only download method would, in my opinion, be a very strange decision indeed.
+1
User avatar
LMan
R64 Founder
R64 Founder
Posts: 4042
Joined: 21/11/2002 - 12:44
Contact:

Post by LMan »

FFRenzy wrote:i'd suggest having the tracks of last year downloadable on a per-track basis, like now. Tracks older than those could go into packs, that are downloadable using BT. A pack per month (or quarter) would keep the number of packs managable, and wouldn't give people whe just 1 track too much overhead when downloading, IMHO.
I think that would make the whole archive a lot more unattractive, especially search-wise. So it really should be an alternative only.
User avatar
Jax
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 82
Joined: 11/01/2006 - 0:54
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Contact:

Other alternatives...

Post by Jax »

If the remixers weren't opposed, why not consider offering a DVD set of 'older' tunes? Assuming older DVD drives, two single layer discs would do it - and I'd happily pay $20 or so.

And what about usenet? Anybody can request/create a group - how about alt.binaries.mp3.c64remix?

I don't know what the bandwith usage of RKO is, but I imagine there's the odd person periodically who stumbles across the site for the first time and thinks "Oh wow, awesome - I'll run a mass download of all of the tracks"... Maybe it would be more cost effective to retain (perhaps) only the latest six months of remixes online, and once per month post the entire collection to usenet. Most *decent* usenet providers have decent retention - EasyNews (the .com, not the .de) has around 30 days retention on binaries. Other newsgroups frequently receive monthly posts of entire collections (like GBA roms, etc.) - at least this would be legal :)

That said, I do like the convenience of being able to search RKO to find and grab any track on there instantly :(

Just a couple of ideas...

(But I'd REALLY buy the DVD set :))

Jax
LDA #$0F
STA $D418
User avatar
the_JinX
Forum Celebrity
Forum Celebrity
Posts: 486
Joined: 12/12/2005 - 10:36
Location: Beverwijk, The Netherlands
Contact:

Post by the_JinX »

I'd run a permanent seed..

I do have a (I think) complete RKO mirror.. but it is not all that good.. and hard to keep up to date (download new mp3's untill I get a warning that I allready have the file)
And it's a folder with WAY TOO MANY MP3's to be healthy..

So a good clean RKO mirror as torrent would be loved !!
User avatar
Jax
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 82
Joined: 11/01/2006 - 0:54
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Contact:

Really older mixes...

Post by Jax »

When people talk about 'complete' mirrors or collections, does this include the bunch that were 'retired' from RKO a couple of years back? I'm sure I remember a news item there at one point saying that some of the older mixes were being dropped from the site...

Jax
:(
LDA #$0F
STA $D418
User avatar
Vosla
General Pain In The Forum's Ass
General Pain In The Forum's Ass
Posts: 3680
Joined: 02/12/2002 - 0:12
Location: On the same little planet as you. Be VERY afraid!
Contact:

Post by Vosla »

I got a lot of that 'dropped' tunes just before they went into data nirvana.
If you have a special title in mind...
All is lost.
User avatar
Jax
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 82
Joined: 11/01/2006 - 0:54
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Contact:

Post by Jax »

Vosla wrote:I got a lot of that 'dropped' tunes just before they went into data nirvana.
If you have a special title in mind...
Nothing in particular - I just remember being 'oh so sad' when I realized that at one point I probably had a complete (at the time) collection, and then I busted my puter and lost the stuff... Which is why it would be cool if there was a way to get a complete collection somehow - I reckoned usenet or DVDs would be the most cost-effective.

Jax

(PS kids - remember to perform frequent backups - but I think at the time I had a naff 4x CD-writer - none of these fancy 16x DVD burners...)
LDA #$0F
STA $D418
baffle
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 6
Joined: 12/06/2003 - 18:39

Post by baffle »

tony.rc wrote:I'm just concerned that p2p is perceived as being something illegal.

Therefore ISP's must HATE BitTorrent :)
Most ISPs couldn't care less what you are doing. It's the movie/music/software industry that cares what you do.
--
DS
User avatar
Jax
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 82
Joined: 11/01/2006 - 0:54
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Contact:

Post by Jax »

baffle wrote:Most ISPs couldn't care less what you are doing. It's the movie/music/software industry that cares what you do.
While they might appear not to care what you do, they *do* often impose throttling on certain ports, especially with P2P networks... :(

Jax
LDA #$0F
STA $D418
Skyy
Commodore Fan
Commodore Fan
Posts: 16
Joined: 14/08/2006 - 7:59
Location: Finland

Post by Skyy »

This would be absolutely awesome, to see them being distributed over BitTorrent. I'd love to see it happen (would make downloads alot easier) and helping them to spread around too :)

I vote YAY!

EDIT #1:
Of course I would help them spread around too.. ;)
Worped
Commodore Fan
Commodore Fan
Posts: 18
Joined: 06/07/2006 - 19:01
Location: Canada

Post by Worped »

Jax wrote:
baffle wrote:Most ISPs couldn't care less what you are doing. It's the movie/music/software industry that cares what you do.
While they might appear not to care what you do, they *do* often impose throttling on certain ports, especially with P2P networks... :(

Jax
It's easy enough to change what ports your BT client uses to get around that. Enable encryption of the stream (only some clients support this - Azureus, uTorrent and some others) and you get around any throttling that may be done based on the content of the packets (rather than port number).
User avatar
trace
Forum God
Forum God
Posts: 2056
Joined: 22/11/2002 - 15:32
Location: Hellefors, Sweden
Contact:

Post by trace »

Hey Jan, Maybe you could have like checkboxes beside the tracks so one can check what tracks to download and then just press a download button and all checked tracks will automaticaly be downloaded :)

Even a "Check all tracks" button ;)

Don't know if that thing is hard to do, have no clue how it work :P
(Carpe Diem Seize the day)
Soundcloud PowerTrace
c64-> /various/M-r/Noise_of_SID
User avatar
Jan Lund Thomsen
Forum Admin
Forum Admin
Posts: 1176
Joined: 25/11/2002 - 13:16
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Contact:

Post by Jan Lund Thomsen »

trace wrote:Hey Jan, Maybe you could have like checkboxes beside the tracks so one can check what tracks to download and then just press a download button and all checked tracks will automaticaly be downloaded :)

Even a "Check all tracks" button ;)
No can do (unless someone knows a way to redirect users to a new file after the first file has been downloaded). Of course another option would be to stick all checkmarked tracks in one big zipfile and feed that to people, but somehow I don't think Baffle would like what it would do to the amount of free storage capacity on his server. :D
Post Reply