PS, I've heard the expression "indie" too much now. Now I really want to know what it means. I thought it meant music with "indians" involved, or indian influences or something like that. Clearly I must be off-track.




As usual, Wikipedia is your friend:xo wrote:PS, I've heard the expression "indie" too much now. Now I really want to know what it means. I thought it meant music with "indians" involved, or indian influences or something like that. Clearly I must be off-track.![]()
![]()
![]()
That's exactly the problem I've run into all the time... but it's not only your girlfriend giving you this response... it's probably everyone exept other musicians... friends, family... everyone... They go WOOOW!!! when they are told that you make music... then the next question comes: Have you anything on the streets yet? ... next question is: Can you make any money on this?..... and when they figure out you don't... then it's just a time-stealing hobby, and respond the way you just wrote Chris.[edit: to that extent, being in "business" with the music makes it at least easier to justify musical activity: most remixers probably get a lot of "why are you spending so much time on that? It's not going to make any money or anything..."]
Chris Abbott wrote:The answer's simple: everyone will have to share Makke's Sara
Chris
I gave them my membership numbers of PPL, MCPS and PRS (the memberships that count) and my company number, but they feel disinclined to do any actual verification, like, for example, checking my site or ringing up the organisations in question. They'd prefer if I just sent them scans of copyright paperwork for every single damn track in my catalogue. Well, they can screw themselves. They don't ask iTunes to copyright-validate all their tracks, do they?Firstly, you mentioned you are concerned that a complaint was made about you by a third party. I can confirm that this was messaged to you in error and you may disregard this. I apologise if this caused you concern. The reason that your ad was disapproved is because it was found to be in violation of our copyright policy by our AdWords specialists. At this time, advertising is not permitted to promote the copying or distribution of copyrighted content for which you do not have consent from the copyright holder.
I acknowledge the points that you mentioned in your last email, however, before we may approve your ads to run on Google, we need to confirm a couple of points.
(1) If you are a record label we will need proof that this is so.
(2) If you publish your own artists, please also reply to this email providing proof of this.
(3) You mentioned in your last email that you own the vast majority of the material on your site. If there is any material that you do not own, please reply to this email outlining the material that you do not own.
(4) If you wish, you may provide us with any other material that you believe is relevant.
You know what I'd done with the sword instead?!Vosla wrote:I mean, no woman allowed me to mount my sword onto a wall, not even in my hobby cellar.