Fatal server crash (and the state of the scene)
Fatal server crash (and the state of the scene)
Hey all,
due to a severe server crash, Remix64 and the messageboard have reverted to a week-old status. Any forum posts, votes, shouts or any other submissions made to the site during the past week have been lost.
C64Audio.com is also affected, Chris is working on fixing it.
Sorry for any inconveniences this might cause.
due to a severe server crash, Remix64 and the messageboard have reverted to a week-old status. Any forum posts, votes, shouts or any other submissions made to the site during the past week have been lost.
C64Audio.com is also affected, Chris is working on fixing it.
Sorry for any inconveniences this might cause.
-
- Forum God
- Posts: 5307
- Joined: 22/11/2002 - 12:21
- Location: Dubai. No, not really.
- Contact:
Re: Fatal server crash
So nobody got that post where I promised everyone free CDs?
D'oh.
Chris
Seriously: D'oH!
D'oh.
Chris
Seriously: D'oH!
Won't somebody PLEASE think of the children?
-
- Forum God
- Posts: 5307
- Joined: 22/11/2002 - 12:21
- Location: Dubai. No, not really.
- Contact:
Re: Fatal server crash
It's complicated, what happened, but I've spoken to the guy at the web hosting company and I think it was just plain bad luck that slashed through the levels of precaution (looks like a disk controller developed a fault and the backup drive in the machine was trashed too: it was the weekly offsite backup that was used to restore the data).
The bugger is that c64audio.com was excluded from the weekly backup on the grounds that it was too damn big for offsite, the code was static, and the site was being backed up to the internal hard drive anyway. So the latest copy I have is from just after I launched: which had yet to fix some problems. Grr...
Chris
The bugger is that c64audio.com was excluded from the weekly backup on the grounds that it was too damn big for offsite, the code was static, and the site was being backed up to the internal hard drive anyway. So the latest copy I have is from just after I launched: which had yet to fix some problems. Grr...
Chris
Won't somebody PLEASE think of the children?
-
- Forum God
- Posts: 5307
- Joined: 22/11/2002 - 12:21
- Location: Dubai. No, not really.
- Contact:
Re: Fatal server crash
(and the daily backup had been disabled at my request since it was killing the performance of something that was at the time fairly critical).Chris Abbott wrote:It's complicated, what happened, but I've spoken to the guy at the web hosting company and I think it was just plain bad luck that slashed through the levels of precaution (looks like a disk controller developed a fault and the backup drive in the machine was trashed too: it was the weekly offsite backup that was used to restore the data).
The bugger is that c64audio.com was excluded from the weekly backup on the grounds that it was too damn big for offsite, the code was static, and the site was being backed up to the internal hard drive anyway. So the latest copy I have is from just after I launched: which had yet to fix some problems. Grr...
Chris
Won't somebody PLEASE think of the children?
- Analog-X64
- I Adore My 64
- Posts: 3518
- Joined: 08/12/2002 - 3:50
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: Fatal server crash
I knew something was wrong when I couldnt connect to Remix64, I've been a member for a very long time and I dont ever recall the site being down for so long.
I can feel you're pain and the devastating fact that data was lost, I was in a similar situation at a company I worked for, Raid system failed and the current TAPE Backups were useless because the Tape heads had failed, yet didnt report any errors during backup and verification. Luckily the previous weeks backups were good.
I was under alot of heat having to explain to my I.T. Manager and Company CEO why we didnt have current backup.
Now this situation got me thinking, I have not way of conacting anyone here to know what is going on... so my question is.
Do any of you use, Google Talk? or MSN Messenger??
I can feel you're pain and the devastating fact that data was lost, I was in a similar situation at a company I worked for, Raid system failed and the current TAPE Backups were useless because the Tape heads had failed, yet didnt report any errors during backup and verification. Luckily the previous weeks backups were good.
I was under alot of heat having to explain to my I.T. Manager and Company CEO why we didnt have current backup.
Now this situation got me thinking, I have not way of conacting anyone here to know what is going on... so my question is.
Do any of you use, Google Talk? or MSN Messenger??
-
- Forum God
- Posts: 5307
- Joined: 22/11/2002 - 12:21
- Location: Dubai. No, not really.
- Contact:
Re: Fatal server crash
Won't somebody PLEASE think of the children?
Re: Fatal server crash
AAAAARGH!!! My precious posting count!!! I was above 600!!!
AAAAARGH!!! My newly made, and hard thought out comments on RKO shoutbox!!!
AAAAARGH!!! The "r" in "razmo" is back!!!!
Ha-ha!
I said that LMan's Remix 64 site sucks! Booooo!!!
alright, alright! I'll manage, but PLEASE put the "R" back in "Razmo" ... it looks stupid without (and NO! I'm not an azmo even though Omoroca's research seem to prove somethin... I guess... *grumble grumble*)
AAAAARGH!!! My newly made, and hard thought out comments on RKO shoutbox!!!
AAAAARGH!!! The "r" in "razmo" is back!!!!
Ha-ha!
I said that LMan's Remix 64 site sucks! Booooo!!!
alright, alright! I'll manage, but PLEASE put the "R" back in "Razmo" ... it looks stupid without (and NO! I'm not an azmo even though Omoroca's research seem to prove somethin... I guess... *grumble grumble*)
Regards, Jess D. Skov-Nielsen (Razmo).
Re: Fatal server crash
its my fault , i havnt posted here in ages then as soon as i do *boom*.
that post took me ages to write too
that post took me ages to write too
woop tis a remaker
Re: Fatal server crash
Thought something serious must have happened for both sites to be offline last night... ah well time to relisten to the recent tracks and repost the votes...
Lie with passion and be forever damned...
Re: Fatal server crash
I think it was all the HAHA!'s that broke the server
-
- Forum Admin
- Posts: 175
- Joined: 21/09/2003 - 0:36
- Location: Eden Prairie, MN, USA (born and raised in Hungary)
- Contact:
Re: Fatal server crash
I think it was me, folks. I must've passed my bad karma over to Remix64.com
During the past month or so the following devices broke down in my house (most required replacements): washing machine, dishwasher, food disposer, water heater, my precious TiVo had a hard drive crash (that was painful!) (NOTE: it was a Western Digital HD), at work my Linux machine's HD crashed (yep, also a Western Digital), my cable modem started acting up, plus I also had a small accident with my car.
So, NATURALLY, after I decided to catch up on RKO and rated a whole bunch of new tunes with comments, Remix64's server crashed (and it also lost all my recent comments/ratings), probably at exactly the same time I've tried to look at the new Hülsbeck CD on C64Audio.com...
It was definitely me. Sorry, folks!
During the past month or so the following devices broke down in my house (most required replacements): washing machine, dishwasher, food disposer, water heater, my precious TiVo had a hard drive crash (that was painful!) (NOTE: it was a Western Digital HD), at work my Linux machine's HD crashed (yep, also a Western Digital), my cable modem started acting up, plus I also had a small accident with my car.
So, NATURALLY, after I decided to catch up on RKO and rated a whole bunch of new tunes with comments, Remix64's server crashed (and it also lost all my recent comments/ratings), probably at exactly the same time I've tried to look at the new Hülsbeck CD on C64Audio.com...
It was definitely me. Sorry, folks!
|......|......
|_/\_|_/\_
./~~\/~~\
|_/\_|_/\_
./~~\/~~\
Re: Fatal server crash
Damn, LaLa, it WAS you!!
Anyways, Western Digital is mostly crap. They are noisy and they crash a lot. Get a Seagate (Barracuda) instead. Reliable and quiet.
Anyways, Western Digital is mostly crap. They are noisy and they crash a lot. Get a Seagate (Barracuda) instead. Reliable and quiet.
Experto credite!
Re: Fatal server crash
Ha-ha!
Lala's house has gone gaga! Haha
--Anyone want to remix my SIDs?--
merman1974 on Twitter, Steam and Xbox Live
merman1974 on Twitter, Steam and Xbox Live
Re: Fatal server crash
LMan:
Since the crash, it seem that it's not possible to upload an avatar anymore, unless it's from a different server. Is this intentional, or something you've overlooked?
Also, 80*80 generaly look rather cramped in my opinion. I think it would look better, if the max size was the same as the "(=======C64)" graphics right above the avatar.
Another thing is, that I've seen other people here with bigger sized, and even animated avatars. How is this accomplished? ... I've made a larger 128 * 128 avatar on a seperate server, but the Remix64 site will not allow me anything bigger than 80 * 80, which to me seem weird when others have larger avatars.
Could you shed some light on the subject? ... Prlrlrlrlrlrleeeeeeeease?
I see that you rank graphics is 119 pixels wide... if you take a digital camera and resize t to 120 pixels on the X axis, and have a constrained scaling, the Y axis will be 160 pixels, which to me is a reasonable portrait format, and would make it possible to show more than just a severed head... and the women could show more as well
ooops!... think I managed to off-topic this one... but at least I'm good at it
Since the crash, it seem that it's not possible to upload an avatar anymore, unless it's from a different server. Is this intentional, or something you've overlooked?
Also, 80*80 generaly look rather cramped in my opinion. I think it would look better, if the max size was the same as the "(=======C64)" graphics right above the avatar.
Another thing is, that I've seen other people here with bigger sized, and even animated avatars. How is this accomplished? ... I've made a larger 128 * 128 avatar on a seperate server, but the Remix64 site will not allow me anything bigger than 80 * 80, which to me seem weird when others have larger avatars.
Could you shed some light on the subject? ... Prlrlrlrlrlrleeeeeeeease?
I see that you rank graphics is 119 pixels wide... if you take a digital camera and resize t to 120 pixels on the X axis, and have a constrained scaling, the Y axis will be 160 pixels, which to me is a reasonable portrait format, and would make it possible to show more than just a severed head... and the women could show more as well
ooops!... think I managed to off-topic this one... but at least I'm good at it
Regards, Jess D. Skov-Nielsen (Razmo).