Tonka wrote:Hehe - I'm admittedly very biased in this area!

I personally like my synth music brutally sequenced and in perfect time. This (to me) is how synth music is supposed to sound.
My point is, that I'd like to have both options... trackers and sequencers would be nice to have in the same package somehow... but if I had to choose between the two, I'd definitely take the sequencer over the tracker...
Which is exactly what DS2 DOES have (tracker & piano roll in one package)!
Read the thread, maaaannnn! 
Yeah, but not in SONAR!.... I'm biased too you know!
I'm hardcore SONAR user here, and would not touch logic or cubase with a 10 foot pole

or any other sequencer for that matter. I've grown too old for changes now
In fact I'd want the tracker style as part of the hardware synths I've got that has buildt in arpeggiator with user patterns... so it's no real use that it's the sequencer that has the tracker thing... it should be in the hardware synths tailored to their own specific arp engines
Yeah I'm demanding I know...
But don't get me wrong Tonka... I certainly know what you mean by "synth music"... and that it has to be dead tight and so on... but again, some types of synth music does give a nice feel to it if it has a bit of "human feel" on them... I bet you like Jarre right? ... I bet he did some of his early music recording on an 8-track tape recorder, and I bet some of it was performed live... still, I find that to be synth music
Please don't turn this into a synced vs live debate... that is not my goal here... I just say that FOR ME, I enjoy both ways of working, and preferably mixed in the same tune as both methods have something unique to offer.
Doing tracker/sequencer programing can give you tracks that are simply impossible to do live, and playing live can give you a dynamic feel in your leads/basses/drums that would take hours to program note by note in a tracker...
As Chris wrote in some other thread: Thank god there are choises to be made!
