I think overall the results were as expected with the usual suspects coming up top - well done guys!


Cheers to everyone who voted and to the top placing winners!!
I agree I would like to see another one or two catagories. Don't know about terrible remixer of the year though. RKO has high standards and anything that is terrible won't get on though some do.C64GLeN wrote:I was sadly overlook this year again. There should be a 'terrible (but covers up for it by being deliberately terrible) remixer of the year' category.
huh? No way, mate. Even the terrible ones passing by the "high standards of RKO"Doddsy wrote:I agree I would like to see another one or two catagories. Don't know about terrible remixer of the year though. RKO has high standards and anything that is terrible won't get on though some do.C64GLeN wrote:I was sadly overlook this year again. There should be a 'terrible (but covers up for it by being deliberately terrible) remixer of the year' category.
Kate-Z wrote:It should be pointed out, however, that C64Glen *prides* himself out of making intentionally terrible remixes, intended to cause wincing!
We all know that glen is an attention seeker, so that's ok...SarahKreuz31 wrote:Kate-Z wrote:It should be pointed out, however, that C64Glen *prides* himself out of making intentionally terrible remixes, intended to cause wincing!damn, you`re right. Now it makes all sense why he wants a "terrible Remixer OTY" ; He just wants the Spotlight. DAMN YOU,GLEN!!!!!!!1111111
By reading this thread again in a hurry,I just have to say that the "The one that got away"-Categorie is a very good Idea. There are quite a few that were awesome but didn`t get the attention (if attention means shouts/comments/votes), especially @ amigaremix.com! And something I recognized yesterday: You can`t see how many downloads a Track got at AmigaRemix. Why not ? The number of downloads is viewed at RKO as a thumbnail, if you`re moving your Cursor above the mp3-file.
edit;okay, the last one was off-topisch