IGNORE! Machine did this instead of 'reply to thread'

beyond · Post by **beyond** » 04/04/2011 - 19:16

Who is this LMan?

Dumper · Post by **Dumper** » 05/04/2011 - 2:08

beyond wrote:Who is this LMan?

I don't know, I ignore the members.

Steve B · Post by **Steve B** » 10/04/2011 - 12:45

Dumper · Post by **Dumper** » 10/04/2011 - 23:27

merman · Post by **merman** » 11/04/2011 - 11:11

I went a whole TEN DAYS ignoring this thread... of course, that was mainly because I was on holiday...

Vosla · Post by **Vosla** » 12/04/2011 - 20:16

Well... for ignoring this thread - it survived 40 pages now, still counting.

Post by **LMan** » 13/04/2011 - 7:27

beyond wrote:Who is this LMan?

I've decided to simply ignore this kind of ignorance.

Dumper · Post by **Dumper** » 13/04/2011 - 9:11

Ignorance is bliss.

merman · Post by **merman** » 13/04/2011 - 10:06

Dumper wrote:Ignorance is bliss.

Ignorance is bliss. Wikipedia is blissful.

Vosla · Post by **Vosla** » 14/04/2011 - 19:38

merman wrote:
Dumper wrote:Ignorance is bliss.
Ignorance is bliss. Wikipedia is blissful.

Wikipedia isn't ignorant. Or they wouldn't be so triggerhappy about "nonrelevant" retro bands...

Dumper · Post by **Dumper** » 14/04/2011 - 23:58

You know what to do.

IGNORE WIKIPEDIA.

Analog-X64 · Post by **Analog-X64** » 15/04/2011 - 1:01

Commie user is ignoring this thread.

Dumper · Post by **Dumper** » 17/04/2011 - 9:06

Analog-X64 wrote:Commie user is ignoring this thread.

Well if we can ignore it, he certainly should.