Posted: 18/08/2006 - 13:54
You need more than that for a lettermoog wrote:WOW, it's about 0,122 kbyteLMan / Remix64 wrote:One more name-calling on this thread and I'm going to explode into 1000 bits.
You need more than that for a lettermoog wrote:WOW, it's about 0,122 kbyteLMan / Remix64 wrote:One more name-calling on this thread and I'm going to explode into 1000 bits.
Old school ram packs are much better.Chris Abbott wrote:You need more than that for a letter
While you're kind of right with this, I think it's actually the other way round.Chris Abbott wrote: I think many times here the native English speakers, or people whose English is native level are maybe overly sensitive to nuances and subtleties that appear to be posts written by people whose English is more functional. We react to what's written, but I certainly sometimes forget that people might choose inappropriate words, or say something with a style that's acceptable in one language, but not in another.
No it wasn't, you ugly bastard son of a unicycle!weblaus wrote:While you're kind of right with this, I think it's actually the other way round.Chris Abbott wrote: I think many times here the native English speakers, or people whose English is native level are maybe overly sensitive to nuances and subtleties that appear to be posts written by people whose English is more functional. We react to what's written, but I certainly sometimes forget that people might choose inappropriate words, or say something with a style that's acceptable in one language, but not in another.
Pretty much all the arguments flaring up the last few months usually originate from guys clearly not having a good grip on the English language (some worse than others) and not understanding what was written correctly, especially not the nuances and subtleties. Seems inevitable that this results in them feeling pissed off just because they didn't get the point right and then retaliating with some sort of broken English rant that just makes the situation worse.
Chris, WHY do you always have to bring your sexuality into these discussions?...Chris Abbott wrote:goes both ways a bit...
Now THERE'S a put-down you don't hear everyday...Chris Abbott wrote:No it wasn't, you ugly bastard son of a unicycle!
Just because!Tonka wrote:Chris, WHY do you always have to bring your sexuality into these discussions?...Chris Abbott wrote:goes both ways a bit...
Last time I checked the ability to submit tunes to RKO wasn't part of the constitution nor was I (or anyone who works behind the scenes at the site) giving out any kind of guarantee that everyone can upload (or download, or access the site, or ... you get the idea.)Tonka wrote:Gibs hasn't been able to upload for over 2 months and has a right to be pissed off - I would be. How helpful Jan has been to him, we may never know... If Jan is all out of ideas, then maybe making this problem public is the best thing to do.
** THE BEST REPLY EVER! **Jan Lund Thomsen wrote:Thus, the claim that anyone has the "right to be pissed off" for not being able to upload becomes a steaming pile of equine fertilizer.