Ah, see, I'm one of those awkward Mac users, and I mostly use Safari (as do an absolute shed-load of Mac users now). However, although I'm awkward, I can also be helpful, so here's what I see on those pages:
Safari is, on the whole, extremely standards-compliant, so I'm not sure what the problem might be.
That statistic view is really a nice thing. It gives you the nice abillity to see what the majority of the voters have voted. A single smiley showing a "very good" face, can be misleading, especially when the percentage is close to the "border" of another voting category (as with my two current remixes). nice feature! don't remove it! ;O)
I agree - this is really good - and well put together. It also shows how little the 'poor' votes contribute to the overall rating (proving a point about poor votes having little effect)
Many thanks Lman - once again your hard work will (hopefully) pay dividend and maybe even end this discussion....maybe. Top work !
Well, even if it doesn't end the discussion, it does somewhat prove what Neil and Marcus have been arguing all along: how inconsequential those "bad" votes are to the overall score. After all, every track seems to have a couple.
> Neil and Marcus have been arguing all along:
And me... I originally looked at the votes some time ago and officially posted the conclusion on this very forum that there was no anti-voting: and that it's the yellow smileys that drag marks down.
Well, even if it doesn't end the discussion, it does somewhat prove what Neil and Marcus (and Chris, who I totally forgot about, despite him now being the editor of this site, and despite having composed a two-thousand word interview with him for Pixelsurgeon) have been arguing all along: how inconsequential those "bad" votes are to the overall score. After all, every track seems to have a couple.