Ok! Warning! submission from 'an old composer'......
On one level, (and I guess this is unique to myself, Reyn, Jonathan Dunn and any others who have submitted remixes), you are tinkering with your own history and, to
a certain extent changing the original to 'How you would have made it sound' given the same level of technology and polyphony available now. So, in that sense, it is still
a voyage of discovery, especially as far as the new parts you add are concerned. I guess that the composers also get an easier ride with regard to 'changing' things. "Hey!
It's my tune so i'll remix it anyway I damn well please' without worrying about respecting the composer. (Woo! Is this getting too psychological?
).
But... Then again, we all worry about how the end product will be received. So, you still pay attention to what you're doing.
When it comes to remixing/re-arranging someone else's work, then I become just like everyone else. Respect for the original work is important but, (like Chris said), how
you hear it in your own head, for me, that's what I'm after. It is challenging. Far more challenging than I thought and I have to say this.... The standard of the best remixes
on this website is high. Like very H I G H ! ! ! Production values in some pieces are massive and perfectionism is a rife disease which is good for everyone. It delivers better
sounding tunes for the listener, pushes the ceiling up and makes every remixer/musician strive that little bit harder.
Having played in bands for 30 years and used backtracks with click tracks for about 15 of those years, I've spent a lot of time trying to created a perfect clone of each and every
pop and rock tune we've wanted to cover, before dropping out the guitar, bass and drums, (normally), which will get played live on stage. That! like this, is a skill that develops
over months and years.
Overall, for me anyway, it's really, really good fun and, even now at 53 years of age, I learn more with each and every piece of music.